Fluoride In Municipal Drinking Water: What You Need To Know – Hydroviv

Fluoride In Municipal Drinking Water: Brief History, Summary of Science, and Takeaways

Fluoride In Municipal Drinking Water:  Brief History, Summary of Science, and Takeaways

Eric Roy, Ph.D.  |  Scientific Founder

Since launching Hydroviv, the most heated questions deal with the issue of fluoride in tap water, mostly due to the conflicting "information" found on the web.  There are a lot of different factors that contribute to the “Fluoride Controversy” and the goal of this article is to lay out some historical context and give a non-exhaustive summary of the credible science.  

Let’s Start With A Bit Of Dental History:

The origin of tap water fluoridation can be traced back to the early 1900’s when a young dentist named Frederick McKay moved to Colorado Springs to open his first dental practice.  One of his first observations upon arriving to Colorado Springs was that a large portion of the local population had unexplained heavy brown stains on their teeth.  While the discolored teeth were unsightly, McKay also observed that they were unusually resistant to decay, and set out to figure out the cause.  In 1931, after decades of persistent investigation, McKay and his collaborators  discovered that the discoloration and resistance to decay were due to unusually high concentrations of fluoride in the local water supply.  

In the 1930’s, water testing methodologies became more sophisticated, which allowed researchers to investigate whether or not there was an "ideal" fluoride concentration in water that was  high enough to prevent tooth decay, but not so high that it would cause the unsightly discoloration (also known as mottling).  One set of researchers found that a fluoride concentration near one part per million (ppm) seemed to be the “sweet spot” that satisfied both requirements.  Fast forward to 1945, and Grand Rapids, MI became the first city  to add fluoride to their public water supply with the goal of improving dental health. The measure worked, and cavities in children born after the start of fluoridation dropped by more than 60%.   Seventy years later, fluoride remains a major tool used by dentists and the public to combat tooth decay.  

While this is certainly a success story, a lot has been learned about dental fluoride treatment since the mid 20th century.  For example, we have learned that most of the protection provided by fluoride appears to be topical (a result of the fluoride coming in contact with the tooth itself after it emerges from the gums), rather than sub gum line tooth growth.  This means that the anti-decay benefits can be realized by applying it topically (e.g. using toothpaste, mouthwash).  

Is Ingesting Fluoride Bad?

While there is near consensus among public health and dental organizations that the population-scale dental benefits of tap water fluoridation outweigh the risks, The World Health Organization, Center for Disease Control, and other organizations agree that some children in North America are getting too much accumulated exposure to fluoride, which can lead to a condition called  fluorosis.  Although nearly all  cases of fluorosis in North America are purely cosmetic, they are problems nonetheless, which has generated discussion about lowering the "ideal"  concentration of fluoride  in drinking water and/or decreasing the amount of fluoride in children’s toothpaste formulations.

In addition to the problems associated with fluorosis, there is concern among some that fluoride can affect neurological development and function in children.  There are, in fact, human studies (mostly Chinese  & Indian populations) that have found a correlation between high fluoride exposure and lower IQ.  In 2012, a group from The Harvard School of Public Health conducted a meta-analysis (i.e.   combining the results of different studies) of all available data, and concluded that “The results support the possibility of an adverse effect of high fluoride exposure on children’s neurological development.”  As you might imagine, this conclusion obviously generated a great deal of alarm when framed by the media, and was cited by opponents of fluoridation as proof that adding fluoride to tap water is dangerous.  However,  when you read the actual study, the group from Harvard also wrote in the same article that each of the original studies “had deficiencies, often very serious ones that limit the conclusions that can be drawn.”  Furthermore, when the same authors were interviewed at a later time by the news media, they were quick to point out that the study was not directly applicable to drinking water fluoridation in the US, because the original studies included some subjects from areas where natural fluoride concentrations in  drinking water were more than 10 times higher than the concentrations found in North American fluoridated tap water.  They argued that a more relevant study would compare subjects whose drinking water had no fluoride to subjects whose water had  fluoride levels at or near levels found in fluoridated North American tap water.  The ideal study would also use a subject population where other factors that contribute to IQ (e.g. poverty, lead, arsenic) are well-controlled.  Since 2012, more studies (with varying research goals) on the topic have been conducted, and the methodologies, results, and conclusions continue to be passionately debated in the context of tap water fluoridation in North America.

Even more recently, tap water fluoridation has been brought forward when a British scientist published the first observational study showing a population-level association between fluoridated tap water and hypothyroidism.   However, this study is less than one year old, so it is too recent to follow-on studies or peer-reviewed debate play out in the scientific literature.  This is a "stay tuned" situation.

Overall Takeaway on “The Fluoride Controversy”  

As we step back from the history and science of tap water fluoridation, we must remember that a number of factors go into shaping public policy, for example balancing individual choice against benefits to the overall population.  Proponents of tap water fluoridation are adamant that the dental benefits outweigh the potential health risks, particularly for low income families who may not have access to dental care or products.  However, others argue that because dental hygiene and products have improved (e.g. fluoride toothpastes, mouthwash), there is no longer a need to accept any risk associated with ingesting fluoride in drinking water.  Still others believe that it is fundamentally inappropriate for municipalities  to administer widespread medical treatments through public water supplies.  

Overall, it’s a  situation when there are multiple different (but reasonable) viewpoints on the topic, which can be extremely frustrating for anyone who is seeking a definitive black or white answer to guide their lifestyle.  It also generates an  opportunity for people to present misleading (or fabricated) "data"   to sway public opinion.  (Just remember, anyone can make a website)  If individuals who use fluoride toothpaste and mouthwash decide to purchase a water filter that reduces their exposure to ingested fluoride, we make sure that they are not doing it in response to something they read about government-sponsored public poisoning programs, the "fact" that drinking fluoridated tap water is the same thing as drinking  sarin, or out of fear that the reason why tap water fluoridation was invented was to find a profitable use for toxic waste.  

​While those claims would certainly help us sell a lot of custom water filters, they simply are not true.

As always, feel free to drop an email to info@hydroviv.com or leave comments below



Other Articles We Think You'll Enjoy:
Tap Water Chlorination:  The Good, The Bad, The Unknown

Does Boiling Or Freezing My Water Remove Lead?
Does New York City Have A Lead Problem?

Previous Post Next Post

  • Water Experts