Lead and Copper Rule: What You Need to Know
Analies Dyjak | Policy Nerd
Since 1991, the Lead and Copper Rule (LCR) has aimed to regulate public drinking water systems by specifically targeting lead and copper contamination. It was created by Congress to protect human health, but there are several exemptions and loopholes that compromise its overall mission. Additionally, it’s still considered to be one of the most complicated environmental statues. This article discusses the major insufficiencies of the Lead and Copper Rule, as well as recommendations to protect your family from drinking water contamination.
How Does Lead Enter Tap Water?
Lead enters tap water through old lead service pipes and lead-containing plumbing. Water leaving a treatment plant may be in compliance with loose EPA standards, but could become contaminated once it enters older infrastructure. Houses built before 1986 were most likely built with lead pipes and lead plumbing.
What are the Health Effects of Lead Contamination in Drinking Water?
As recent as 2017 the Center for Disease Control (CDC) reiterated that there is no safe blood lead level (BLL) for children. Even though an action level of 15 parts per billion still exists, there is still no safe level for children. It is zero. The scientific community and most regulatory agencies have acknowledged this, and still municipalities follow an extremely high threshold of lead in drinking water. A dose of lead that would have little to no impact on adults can have a significant and lifelong impacts on an infant or child. They are the most sensitive population in the case of lead because it’s a neurotoxin and healthy brain development between the years of 0-5 is crucial. Learning disabilities, shorter stature, hearing impairment, and impairment of formation and function of blood cells are just some of the health effects in children. Pregnant Women are also sensitive to lead contamination in drinking water. Lead accumulates in bones where it’s stored with calcium. Lead is released from bones in the form of maternal calcium which is used to help develop the fetus. Lead can also enter the placenta and have serious developmental effects on the fetus.
What is the Lead and Copper Rule?
The EPA's Lead and Copper Rule (40 CFR Part 141 Subpart 1) is part of the National Primary Drinking Water Regulations under the Safe Drinking Water Act. The rule governs 68,000 public water systems across the United States, and has created provisions to help reduce lead and copper throughout community water systems. While the goals of this statute are in good faith, there are several loopholes, exemptions, and regulatory flaws that don’t necessarily prioritize human health. The most obvious and deceptive flaw being the 90th percentile rule. Only the 90th percentile of users must meet the EPA threshold of 15 parts per billion ( 0.015mg/L ) for lead and 1.3mg/L 1.3 parts per billion (1.3mg/L) for copper. This means that 10% of users can be in exceedance of the threshold and still be in compliance with the law.
What are the Sampling Requirements Under the Lead and Copper Rule?
There are many other components of the EPA's Lead and Copper Rule that leave users confused about what’s in their water. The most profoundly disappointing part of the Lead and Copper Rule is the municipal sampling requirements. The sampling protocol requires municipalities to collect a set number of residential samples, rather than a percentage of households within a community. For example, if a public water system services 100,000 people, they are only required to collect 100 samples, rather than a percentage of the total population. Municipalities that have 10,000-100,000 residents are required to collect 60 samples and municipalities with 3,301-10,000 residents are only required to collect 40 samples. Houses built before 1986, (when the use of household lead pipes became illegal), were most likely built with lead infrastructure. Moral of the story, very few households are made aware of lead contamination. Additionally, a public water system servicing less than 50,000 people can be eligible for “reduced monitoring” which decreases the number of samples required to collect. Reduced monitoring means that municipalities are only required to collect residential tap water samples once every 3 years. Systems that service 3,300 or fewer people can receive a waiver from the state allowing them to test for lead and copper once every 9 years. 9 years is an extremely long time. Lead concentrations can change overnight, especially if source water or corrosion control measures change.
Who Regulates Lead In Drinking Water?
Municipalities must disclose information about lead and copper in their drinking water to State officials and residents in the form of annual Consumer Confidence Reports. In 2007, revisions were made to the statute that sought to improve transparency between local, state, and federal agencies. The 2007 revisions to the EPA's Lead and Copper Rule require municipalities to notify either state or federal agencies if they have plans to change their treatment methods/source water, or anything else that might in any way increase the corrosion potential of lead (sound familiar?). The head agency is then required to approve these changes before they are implemented. Through this revision, municipal water providers must also notify residents about changes that may affect lead levels. The 2015 lead crisis in Flint, Michigan often comes to mind when cooperative federalism matters are being discussed. It’s important to note that Flint occurred after this revision. Protocols were in place, and still regulatory agencies failed to communicate.
How Are Water Samples Collected and Tested For Lead?
The Lead and Copper Rule developed a sampling protocol for both pre-selected and voluntary households. Municipalities initially pre-select “Tier 1” sites, which are older homes that most likely contain lead lines. However, homeowners can deny testing or fail to submit a sample if they choose to do so. If an inadequate number of Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 samples are collected, the municipality will then draw samples from “representative sites.” At these sites, local officials are in complete control of how samples are collected. The Lead and Copper Rule requires a 1 liter “first draw” sample, which is water that has been stagnant in plumbing for at least six hours. Samples should be taken from a tap that’s typically used for consumption of drinking water.
Invalidating Lead-Containing Water Samples
A state agency has the authority to invalidate sampling if; the laboratory establishes improper sample analysis cause erroneous results, the state determines that the sample was taken from a site that did not meet the site selection criteria, the sample was damaged in transit or if “there is substantial reason to believe that the sample was subject to tampering.” Essentially, state laboratories can omit samples for a whole breadth of reasons. Several municipalities have been caught cheating the system by discarding samples with high lead levels. Some municipalities instruct residents to “pre-flush” and allow their taps to run for five minutes the night before sampling. This helps to clear stagnant water which completely defeats the purpose because “pre-flushing” has been cited as an effective way to reduce lead levels in drinking water. Other municipalities have told residents to wait until their water “runs cold” before testing, which accomplishes the same thing as pre-flushing.
Are Municipalities Required to Replace Lead Service Lines?
If 10% of water samples exceed the 15 part per billion action level after corrosion control and source water treatment requirements have been met, a municipality must replace 7% of lead service lines per year. Line replacements stop whenever new samples meet the lead action level for two consecutive monitoring periods. Monitoring periods can be anywhere from 6 months, 1 year, 6 years, or even up to 9 years is smaller communities. Once samples exceeding the action level are detected, the system has 12 months after the end of the monitoring period, to submit documents to the state that lay out an action plan.
Our Take:We need to find ways to incentivize voluntary lead testing for homeowners and also incentivize lead testing at the municipal level. Right now municipalities would rather be unaware of a lead problem within a community because they know the reality of how expensive mitigation is going to cost. Of course they want to keep their residents safe but sometimes municipalities legitimately don’t have the funding to do so. In a regulatory sense, the EPA's Lead and Copper Rule is a mess. There are so many exemptions and loopholes, and the regulated sampling techniques offer little to no accuracy to what’s in people’s tap water. On top of that, the regulatory process in this country can take decades. Here are some recommendations on how to reduce lead exposure from our Water Nerds:
Allow your faucet to run for 2 minutes prior to drinking tap water.
See if your city or town has a free lead testing program. Washington D.C., New York City, and several other cities have a free lead testing program. If you live in an area that doesn’t have free lead testing, you can pay to send your sample to get laboratory tested.
Purchase a filter that is optimized to remove lead from water.
Current Efforts to Update the Lead and Copper Rule
Current Administration: Delayed updates to the Lead and Copper Rule. EPA is proposing updates for 2020: National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for Lead and Copper: Regulatory Revisions and the Final Rule. We don’t really know how the administration is going to tackle these loopholes or gaps within the statute. Michigan has a really great proposed rule to tackle lead and copper in drinking water. But again, several sections of the bill won’t be implemented until 2024.Other Articles We Think You Might Enjoy:
Lead: What You Need To Know About This Toxic Heavy Metal With A Long History
Things To Know Before Replacing Your Home's Lead Service Pipes
How To Tell If Your Home Has Lead Plumbing or Lead Fixtures
- Analies Dyjak